9th Cir.;
13-16279
The court of appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part a district court’s judgment of dismissal. The court held a California’s university “student conduct code” was not unconstitutionally overbroad or vague in authorizing the discipline of students for conduct, including intimidation or harassment, that threatens or endangers health or safety. The court held further that a university student stated claims for unlawful First Amendment retaliation by alleging that university officials imposed disciplinary sanctions against him based on his exercise of protected speech.
