April 14, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 3rd;
C072585
The Third Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that a debtor who sued a foreclosing lender for violating state nonjudicial foreclosure laws defeated the lender’s anti-SLAPP motion by showing a probability of prevailing on its claims, notwithstanding the fact that they involved both protected and unprotected activity.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Washington, D.C. office for an aviation associate in the litigation department. The ideal ...
Kent & McBride, P.C. a Civil Defense litigation firm with offices in both Cherry Hill, NJ and Middletown, NJ seeks to fill the following...
When you come to work for New Jersey Judiciary you will join an 8500-member strong TEAM that operates with the highest standards of independ...
