SAN FRANCISCO — The California Supreme Court has agreed to review a decision that would require Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton to refund fees to a former client who wasn’t informed that the firm had flagged a potential conflict of interest.
Kevin Rosen of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, who is representing Sheppard Mullin in the case, petitioned the state high court in March after a January decision by a California appellate court went in favor of its former client, J-M Manufacturing Co. Inc.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
