July 05, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 6th;
H040508
The Sixth Appellate District reversed a judgment. The court held that a plaintiff alleging a defendant’s intentional interference with his at-will employment contract was not required to allege that the defendant’s conduct was independently wrong.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a full-time regular Judicial Secretary I, Judic...
The County is looking for a skilled and seasoned County Attorney to oversee the Law Department in delivering top-tier legal services, repres...
Position Summary: The Corporate General Counsel will manage and coordinate all legal and compliance matters affecting the company. The Gen...
