C.A. 2nd;
B258353
The Second Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that a contractor’s reliance on a subcontractor’s bid could not be deemed reasonable where it failed to consider material terms in that bid.
July 19, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 2nd;
B258353
The Second Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that a contractor’s reliance on a subcontractor’s bid could not be deemed reasonable where it failed to consider material terms in that bid.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...
Rabb, Hamill, P.A, located in Woodbridge, NJ, seeks an experienced NJ licensed Personal Injury Trial attorney. The successful candidate wi...