SAN FRANCISCO — A lawsuit alleging that Uber Technologies Inc. CEO Travis Kalanick stole the idea for the ride-hailing service seems likely to continue rolling on—at least for now—as attorneys wrangle over whether the case is time-barred.
At a hearing Wednesday, San Francisco Superior Court Judge Mary Wiss seemed skeptical of the notion that Kevin Halpern, who says Uber is a carbon copy of his unsuccessful “Celluride” concept, didn’t grow suspicious enough to pursue his case when he learned about Uber in 2010.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
