C.A. 2nd;
B268130
The Second Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that there was no “reasonably probable” evidence in a personal injury sufficient to support jury awards of past and future lost earnings.
September 30, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 2nd;
B268130
The Second Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that there was no “reasonably probable” evidence in a personal injury sufficient to support jury awards of past and future lost earnings.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Our client, a thriving personal injury firm known for its commitment to compassionate client care is seeking an attorney with 5+ years of ex...
McCarter and English s Chambers-ranked Government Contracts group is seeking an experienced, diligent, and proactive government contracts as...
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a central staff attorney vacancy. A regular ful...