October 03, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 1st;
A142424
The First Appellate District reversed in part a judgment. The court held that expert testimony regarding the chemical composition of seized narcotics was inadmissible where it was based solely on the expert’s visual comparison of the pills with pictures of illicit drugs displayed on a website.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC is seeking talented and motivated associate attorneys for several positions. Candidates must be admi...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a litigator with at least 2-4 years of experience in all aspects of commercial litigation (i.e., depositions and ...
A prestigious matrimonial law firm in Garden City is seeking a skilled Associate Attorney with 5 to 7 years of experience in family law. The...
