January 26, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 2nd;
B261130
The Second Appellate District affirmed a judgment of conviction. The court held that the prosecutor’s misleading statements regarding voluntary intoxication, made in closing argument to the jury, were harmless.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
AMENDED NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY JUDGE VACANCIES DISTRICT OF UTAH The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit seeks applicati...
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...
