9th Cir.;
13-17489
The court of appeals affirmed a district court judgment. The court held that a former state attorney failed to show that he was an “original source” of claims made in a qui tam action alleging fraud against the government.
February 06, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
9th Cir.;
13-17489
The court of appeals affirmed a district court judgment. The court held that a former state attorney failed to show that he was an “original source” of claims made in a qui tam action alleging fraud against the government.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a full-time regular Judicial Secretary I, Judic...
The County is looking for a skilled and seasoned County Attorney to oversee the Law Department in delivering top-tier legal services, repres...
Position Summary: The Corporate General Counsel will manage and coordinate all legal and compliance matters affecting the company. The Gen...