9th Cir.;
07-56667
The court of appeals affirmed a judgment of dismissal. The court held that the district court lacked jurisdiction over a case involving state law claims only and non-diverse parties.
February 14, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
9th Cir.;
07-56667
The court of appeals affirmed a judgment of dismissal. The court held that the district court lacked jurisdiction over a case involving state law claims only and non-diverse parties.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
RABINOWITZ, LUBETKIN & TULLY IS SEEKING A MOTIVATED AND SKILLED BANKRUPTCY LITIGATION ATTORNEY Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully,...
Position Summary:AMENDED Position Summary: Under the supervision of the Special Education Appeals Unit Managing Attorney, with latitude for ...
Legal Administrative AssistantRivkind, Margulies & Rivkind, P.A.Miami, FL, USAEmployment Type: Full-TimeBenefits Offered: Medical, Retir...