9th Cir.;
14-56366
The court of appeals affirmed a judgment. The court held that an excess insurer that refused either to agree to a proposed settlement or to take over the insured’s defense was bound by the terms of the settlement.
March 21, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
9th Cir.;
14-56366
The court of appeals affirmed a judgment. The court held that an excess insurer that refused either to agree to a proposed settlement or to take over the insured’s defense was bound by the terms of the settlement.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS: Reporting to the Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer &...
Yale New Haven Health seeks a dynamic and collaborative executive to serve as its Vice President, Labor Strategy and Senior Associate Genera...
Nestled in the heart of Northern California Wine Country, Sonoma County is the largest county in the North Bay region of the San Francisco B...