Cal.Sup.Ct.;
S170957
The California Supreme Court affirmed in part and reversed in part a judgment. The court held that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support a special circumstance finding of lying in wait.
April 17, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Cal.Sup.Ct.;
S170957
The California Supreme Court affirmed in part and reversed in part a judgment. The court held that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support a special circumstance finding of lying in wait.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
We are seeking two attorneys with a minimum of two to three years of experience to join our prominent and thriving education law practice in...
Rogers Law Offices is seeking highly motivated and experienced attorneys to join our dynamic team. The ideal candidate will possess a stron...
Description:NFSA has a great opportunity for a Labor Relations Associate and Junior Counsel. This position will support NFSA's collective ba...