April 25, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
9th Cir.;
15-56606
The court of appeals reversed a district court order and remanded. The court held that neither the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) nor the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 preempted a city’s claims for contribution against contractors who allegedly breached their contractual duty to perform services in compliance with federal disability regulations.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
AMENDED NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY JUDGE VACANCIES DISTRICT OF UTAH The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit seeks applicati...
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...
