C.A. 2nd;
B262102
The Second Appellate District reversed in part a judgment and remanded. The court held that a drug dealer did not “personally inflict” great bodily injury by selling a victim heroin that resulted in the victim’s death by overdose.
May 03, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 2nd;
B262102
The Second Appellate District reversed in part a judgment and remanded. The court held that a drug dealer did not “personally inflict” great bodily injury by selling a victim heroin that resulted in the victim’s death by overdose.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT THE SENATE TWELFTH OLBIIL ERA KELULAU (Palau National Congress) POSITION AND SALARY: One Attorney...
Our client, a well-regarded privately owned company with North American Headquarters in Atlanta, has asked The Partners Group to identify an...