May 09, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
9th Cir.;
14-35373
The court of appeals affirmed a district court order. The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the Acting Commissioner of Social Security was substantially justified in arguing against remand of a disability claim on the basis of new, but uninterpreted, test results.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
Boutique midtown Manhattan law firm specializing in sophisticated real estate litigation & representation of commercial and residential ...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Boston, MA office for a Litigation Associate with 3 to 5 years of experience. The ideal ca...
