9th Cir.;
14-35289
The court of appeals affirmed a district court judgment. The court held that the district court did not erroneously require a taxpayer to prove the valuation basis for a refund claim with “precision.”
May 15, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
9th Cir.;
14-35289
The court of appeals affirmed a district court judgment. The court held that the district court did not erroneously require a taxpayer to prove the valuation basis for a refund claim with “precision.”
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Company DescriptionA prominent boutique AV rated Education Law firm located in Westbury, New York. Our firm specializes in education law, sp...
Seeking motivated and skilled litigation attorney to join our dynamic defense litigation firm. Role Involves:Conducting thorough research.Ha...
DEPUTY PORT ATTORNEY III Oakland, CA Salary: $17,294 - $21,419/month, 37.5-hr work week Your Port. Your Community. Your Career. Whe...