C.A. 6th;
H042740
The Sixth Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that a party was barred from raising for the first time on appeal a claim relating to a settlement agreement’s allegedly invalid liquidated damages penalty.
May 15, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 6th;
H042740
The Sixth Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that a party was barred from raising for the first time on appeal a claim relating to a settlement agreement’s allegedly invalid liquidated damages penalty.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
When you come to work for New Jersey Judiciary you will join an 8500-member strong TEAM that operates with the highest standards of independ...
When you come to work for New Jersey Judiciary you will join an 8500-member strong team that operates with the highest standards of independ...
CAREER OPPORTUNITYUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT - USDC-CT 24-14 POSITION: Pro Se Law Clerk OPENI...