The U.S. Supreme Court set off a patent law earthquake with its venue decision TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods Group Brands. But three months later it’s still unclear how far the shock waves will spread.

An analysis of litigation since the high court’s May 22 decision shows district judges, tech companies and patent owners jockeying over the decision’s reach with early rulings setting a bar for establishing venue that may be relatively easy to meet, at least in suits against big companies. Still the immediate impact on patent filings has been pronounced in anticipated—and some unanticipated—ways.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]