July 17, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 2nd
B237804
The Second Appellate District affirmed in part and reversed in part an order and remanded with directions. The court held that for purposes of an anti-SLAPP statute motion to strike, an attorney’s demand letter regarding alleged misappropriation of company assets by a business partner of the attorney’s client arose from protected speech or petitioning activities.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Women Leaders in Consulting Awards honors the industry standouts and rising stars who are making a mark within the profession.
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the New York, NY office for a Litigation Associate with 2 to 4 years of experience. The ideal ...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a patent associate for its Intellectual Property Practice Group. Candidates should have supe...
Boutique union side labor law firm seeks an entry level attorney that can thrive in a fast paced practice that is growing at a rapid rate. E...
