September 18, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 4th
D061449
The Fourth Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that homeowners who failed to allege the name of their lender’s employee or that employee’s authority to tell them that they had been preapproved for a loan modification did not allege the lender’s fraud with sufficient particularity.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
The Superior Court of California, County of Alameda is accepting applications for the position of Legal Research Attorney. Under general dir...
We are seeking an attorney with a minimum of four years of experience in transactional work to join our well-established, nationally renowne...
The Insurance Adjustment Bureau, Inc., Plymouth Meeting, PA, a respected industry leader seeks an attorney with a minimum of 3-7 years exper...
