October 31, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 3rd
C073008
The Third Appellate District denied a petition for writ of mandate. The court held that the refiling of felony charges, with a penalty allegation, did not violate the “two-dismissal” rule, even though both the substantive charges and the penalty allegation had both previously been dismissed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a full-time regular Judicial Secretary I, Judic...
The County is looking for a skilled and seasoned County Attorney to oversee the Law Department in delivering top-tier legal services, repres...
Position Summary: The Corporate General Counsel will manage and coordinate all legal and compliance matters affecting the company. The Gen...
