November 26, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 2nd
B236705
The Second Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that a motor vehicle dealer’s failure to file a timely protest to a manufacturer’s notice terminating the dealer’s franchise did not bar the dealer from both suing and recovering for the manufacturer’s unreasonable refusal to consent to the sale of the dealership and franchise.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
DESCRIPTION: The Metropolitan Transportation Authority ( MTA ) hereby solicits proposals from law firms, including sole practitioners, to pr...
The Partners Group is currently recruiting a VP of Legal for our burgeoning client, a real estate investment firm in Atlanta, GA. The firm h...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit seeks applications for a bankruptcy judgeship in the District of Utah. Bankruptcy ...
