December 04, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 6th
H038616
The Sixth Appellate District affirmed an order of probation. The court held that a condition of probation that restricted the probationer’s association with certain categories of individuals based only on what the probationer “reasonably should know” about those individuals was not unconstitutionally vague.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...
Rabb, Hamill, P.A, located in Woodbridge, NJ, seeks an experienced NJ licensed Personal Injury Trial attorney. The successful candidate wi...
