December 05, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 4th
D059007
The Fourth Appellate District affirmed a judgment of conviction and sentence as modified. In the published portion of its opinion, the court held that the collection of a DNA sample from a felony arrestee did not infringe the arrestee’s Fourth Amendment right to be free of unreasonable search and seizure.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
When you come to work for New Jersey Judiciary you will join an 8500-member strong TEAM that operates with the highest standards of independ...
When you come to work for New Jersey Judiciary you will join an 8500-member strong team that operates with the highest standards of independ...
CAREER OPPORTUNITYUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT - USDC-CT 24-14 POSITION: Pro Se Law Clerk OPENI...
