December 10, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 3rd
C071256
The Third Appellate District affirmed a judgment as modified. The court held in the published portion of its opinion that an order requiring a defendant who was sentenced to serve part of his term on mandatory supervision to pay the cost of that supervision was not statutorily authorized.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...
Rabb, Hamill, P.A, located in Woodbridge, NJ, seeks an experienced NJ licensed Personal Injury Trial attorney. The successful candidate wi...
