9th Cir.
11-35964
The court of appeals affirmed a judgment of the district court. The court held that the district court had authority to decide whether an arbitration clause in an attorney retainer agreement was unconscionable.
December 12, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
9th Cir.
11-35964
The court of appeals affirmed a judgment of the district court. The court held that the district court had authority to decide whether an arbitration clause in an attorney retainer agreement was unconscionable.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Our client, a boutique plaintiffs firm is seeking to hire a junior to mid-level litigation associate to join its growing team. Hired associ...
SALARY: $8,000.69 Biweekly$17,334.83 Monthly$208,017.95 AnnuallyOPENING DATE: 01/29/2025CLOSING DATE: 02/27/2025 11:59 PM PacificDEFINITION/...
Our client is seeking to hire a supervisory attorney for their growing Alabama team. Qualified candidates will have 8+ years of litigation...