C.A. 4th
D064226

The Fourth Appellate District denied a petition for writ of mandate. The court held that neither a plaintiff’s motion to impose liability on a third party for its violation of notices of levy, nor the third party’s motion to quash the notices of levy, were actions or special proceedings subject to a peremptory challenge seeking trial court disqualification on grounds of bias after the trial court had previously determined the judgment creditor’s liability as a matter of fact.