December 23, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 4th
D062831
The Fourth Appellate District affirmed a judgment of conviction. The court held that the crime of a crime to knowingly resisting an executive officer in the performance of his or her duties, with force or violence, does not require proof that the defendant used force directly against or on the executive officer.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...
Rabb, Hamill, P.A, located in Woodbridge, NJ, seeks an experienced NJ licensed Personal Injury Trial attorney. The successful candidate wi...
