9th Cir.
11-16779

The court of appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part a district court judgment and remanded the action for further proceedings. The court held that heirs’ conversion and unjust enrichment claims against a trustee and estate executor were not subject to a special motion to strike under California’s anti-SLAPP statute where they alleged unprotected activities in the form of taking of personal property and acts following a probate court’s final order.