January 22, 2014 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 4th
G047666
The Fourth Appellate District affirmed in part and reversed in part a judgment. The court held that the trial court did not err in admitting into evidence statements allegedly made and placed in STEP notices, field identification cards, and a police report and testified to by a gang expert.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
AMENDED NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY JUDGE VACANCIES DISTRICT OF UTAH The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit seeks applicati...
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...
