March 21, 2014 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
9th Cir.;
12-50398
The court of appeals affirmed in part and vacated in part a district court judgment and remanded the action for resentencing. The court held that federal law does not authorize a district court to impose a sentence to run consecutively to an anticipated sentence to be imposed by a different district court judge.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a full-time regular Judicial Secretary I, Judic...
The County is looking for a skilled and seasoned County Attorney to oversee the Law Department in delivering top-tier legal services, repres...
Position Summary: The Corporate General Counsel will manage and coordinate all legal and compliance matters affecting the company. The Gen...
