March 31, 2014 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 6th;
H038673
The Sixth Appellate District reversed a judgment of conviction and remanded. The court held that the trial court’s erroneous unanimity instruction, in which it misstated the applicable time period for one of several alleged crimes, constituted prejudicial error mandating reversal.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a full-time regular Judicial Secretary I, Judic...
The County is looking for a skilled and seasoned County Attorney to oversee the Law Department in delivering top-tier legal services, repres...
Position Summary: The Corporate General Counsel will manage and coordinate all legal and compliance matters affecting the company. The Gen...
