April 14, 2014 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 2nd;
B245297
The Second Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that a claim by the State of California that it was overcharged and fraudulently billed for delivery services under a state statute was preempted by federal statutes as an impermissible regulation of the defendant’s prices, routes, and services.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
Boutique midtown Manhattan law firm specializing in sophisticated real estate litigation & representation of commercial and residential ...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Boston, MA office for a Litigation Associate with 3 to 5 years of experience. The ideal ca...
