June 04, 2014 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 2nd;
B246527
The Second Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that recent case law finding that an employer owed a duty of care to the family members of an employee who carried home asbestos on his clothing, on a claim of negligence, did not impact well established case law holding that such an employer may not be held liable on a theory of premises liability.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
Our client, a small but highly sophisticated and entrepreneurial tax boutique in Charleston, SC, has asked for our firm s assistance in iden...
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
Boutique midtown Manhattan law firm specializing in sophisticated real estate litigation & representation of commercial and residential ...
