Did it take off? In a word, no. Today, most law firms are using videoconferencing internally, for firmwide departmental meetings and associate training sessions. But lawyers are still finding it too clunky to use for most meat-and-potatoes billable work, like depositions and settlement conferences.

Right now, videoconferencing has a lot to recommend it. For one thing, it’s cheaper than it’s ever been. Companies like Milpitas-based Polycom Inc. and Oslo, Norway’s Tandberg Group offer solid, do-it-yourself videoconferencing units for less than $8,000. And most firms have already outfitted their offices with enough bandwidth to run the simplest one-to-one videoconferences. (Videoconferences between more than two offices often require “bridge” vendors to provide extra bandwidth and help with the setup).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]