• Justin Griffin, Appellant v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-02-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-02
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. PD-1452-10

    KEASLER and HERVEY, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.5, because the petition exceeds 15 pages.The petition is struck. See Rule o

  • Pedro Shepherd v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-11-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-10-05
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. PD-0899-11

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent. Alcala, J., not participating.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) & 9.3(b), because it does not co

  • Darriel Myhand, Appellant v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-26
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. PD-1754-10

    ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS BELL COUNTYKeasler and hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appell

  • Gerald Dewayne Butler v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-12
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NOS. PD-0989/0990/0991/0992-10

    Keasler, and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.3 (b) and 68.4(i) because the original petition is not accompanied by 11 copie

  • William Albert Schatte v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-11-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-10-05
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. PD-1273,, 1274,, 1275,, 1276,, 1277-11

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) & 9.3(b), because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Lancaster County & Berks County Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Eliso Xavier Nash, Appellant v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-26
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NOS. PD-1744-10,, PD-1745-10,, PD-1746-10 & PD-1747-10

    ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS COUNTYKeasler, and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of App

  • Charles Winton Land, Jr v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2010-12-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-08
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. PD-1560-10, PD-1561-10

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i), because the petition does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court

  • Ex Parte Bradley Dale Emerson,

    Publication Date: 2011-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-12
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. WR-74,914-01

    Womack, J., not participating.ORDERPursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application fo

  • Alan Joel Geick, Appellant v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-26
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. PD-1734-10

    ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN COUNTYKeasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of

  • Kendrick Levell Tyler, Appellant v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-02-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-02
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. PD-1362-10

    Keasler, and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) because it does not contain a complete copy of the opinion of the court