Filter This View

  • City of Santa Maria v. Adam

    Publication Date: 2012-11-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-11-21
    Court: C.A. 6th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant: Counsel for Cross-defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant: Richard E. Adam et al. (Landowner Group Parties) Clifford & Brown; Richard G. Zimmer, E. Stewart Johnston Counsel for Cross-defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant: Edward Wineman et al. (The Wineman Parties); Frame & Matsumoto, Ted R. Frame Counsel for Cross-complainant, Cross-defendant and Respondent: City of Santa Maria et al.; Best Best & Krieger, Jeffrey V. Dunn, Eric L. Garner, Jill N. Willis Counsel for Cross-defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent: Golden State Water Company et al.; Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, Robert J. Saperstein Counsel for Cross-defendant, and Respondent: Rural Water Company; Arnold Bleuel et al., Robert S. Krimmer, Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, Robert J. Saperstein Counsel for Cross-defendant, and Respondent: Nipomo Community Services District et al.; Richards Watson & Gershon, James L. Markman Counsel for Cross-defendant, and Respondent: City of Guadalupe, City of Pismo Beach et al.; Baker Manock & Jensen, Christopher L. Campbell, Grace I. Liu, Amanda M. Neal, Nossaman, Guthner et al., Henry S. Weinstock Counsel for Cross-defendant, and Respondent: City of Guadalupe; Baker Manock & Jensen, Christopher L. Campbell, Burke Williams & Sorensen, Mark J. Mulkerin Counsel for Cross-defendant, and Respondent: County of San Benito et al.; Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard, Janet K. Goldsmith Counsel for Cross-defendant, and Respondent: County of Santa Barbara et al.; County Counsel, Kevin E. Ready, Sr., Stephen D. Underwood Counsel for Cross-defendants, and ,espondents: City of Grover Beach, City of Arroyo Grande, Oceano Community Services District; Nossaman, Guthner et al
    Case Number: No. H032750

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 12972CITY OF SANTA MARIA et al., Cross-complainants, Cross-defendants and Respondents

  • Pacific Gas and Electric Company v. City and County of San Francisco

    Publication Date: 2012-03-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-03-26
    Court: C.A. 1st
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Law Office of Ted W. Pelletier and Ted W. Pelletier; Clifford J. Gleicher, Kelly J. Lack and Alejandro Vallejo for Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant and Appellant.
    for defendant: Dennis J. Herrera, City Attorney, Theresa L. Mueller, James M. Emery and William K. Sanders, Deputy City Attorneys for Defendant, Cross-Complainant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. A127554

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 3456 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant and Appellant. v. CI

  • Franklin Mint Company v. Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

    Publication Date: 2010-05-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-05-03
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Loeb & Loeb, Andrew S. Clare, Lawrence B. Gutcho; Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, William A. Norris, Edward P. Lazarus, L. Rachel Helyar, Michael C. Small and Rex Heinke for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
    for defendant: Horvitz & Levy, David M. Axelrad, John A. Taylor, Jr., Frederic D. Cohen; Munger, Tolles & Olson, Michael R. Doyen and Brad D. Brian for Defendant and Respondent Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP. Hill Farrer & Burrill, Kevin H. Brogan, Neil D. Martin and Dean E. Dennis for Defendant and Respondent Mark S. Lee.
    Case Number: B190482

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 5499FRANKLIN MINT COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v.MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP,

  • Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art Foundation, Inc. v. Bichel

    Publication Date: 2010-02-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-01-27
    Court: 1st Cir.
    Judge: Lipez, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-2199

    Before Lipez and Howard, Circuit Judges, and Woodcock, District Judge.*fn1As one observer has noted, this case, which raises important and unsettled legal issues u

  • Newport News Holdings Corporation v. Virtual City Vision, Incorporated, D/B/A Vcv Inc

    Publication Date: 2011-04-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-04-18
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Duncan, Circuit Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-1947

    PUBLISHEDArgued: January 27, 2011Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Duncan wrote the opinion, in which Judge Wilkinson and Judge Mot

  • Citizens for Open Government v. City of Lodi (Browman Development, Inc.)

    Publication Date: 2012-04-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-03-28
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Law Offices of Donald B. Mooney, Donald B. Mooney and John�L. Marshall for Plaintiff and Appellant Citizens for Open Government. Herum Crabtree, Brett S. Jolley and Natalie M. Weber for Plaintiff and Appellant Lodi First.
    for defendant: Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard, Jonathan P. Hobbs, Mona G. Ebrahimi, and Christopher Onstott; D. Stephen Schwabauer and Janice D. Magdich, City Attorneys for Defendant and Respondent City of Lodi. Remy, Thomas, Moose and Manley, Andrea K. Leisy, Howard F. Wilkins III, and Laura M. Harris for Real Party in Interest and Respondent Browman Development Co. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton and Arthur J. Friedman for Real Party in Interest and Respondent Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
    Case Number: No. C065463 No. C065719

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 4442 CITIZENS FOR OPEN GOVERNMENT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF LODI et al., De

  • Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Dammann & Co., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-02-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-02-05
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Fisher, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-1225

    PRECEDENTIALArgued December 2, 2009Before: FISHER, HARDIMAN and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.OPINION OF THE COURTThe Travelers Indemnity Company sought a declaration in federal court that it

  • Etan Industries, Inc. v. Lehmann

    Publication Date: 2010-03-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-26
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Jan P. Patterson, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 03-07-00539-CV

    OPINIONThis appeal from a judgment following a jury trial arises from a dispute between appellant Etan Industries, Inc. and Etan Industries, Inc., d/b/a CMA Cablevision and/or CMA Communications ("

  • Leblanc, et al. v. Lange, et al.

    Publication Date: 2011-09-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-09-22
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 1
    Judge: Evelyn V. Keyes Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 01-08-01029-CV

    OPINIONAppellants David LeBlanc, Hedy LeBlanc, LeBlanc Family Investments Limited Liability Company, Shreveport GP, LLC, Shreveport Doctors Hospital 2004, Ltd., and Shreveport Hospital Man

  • People v. Williams

    Publication Date: 2013-05-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-05-06
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bill Lockyer and Kamala D. Harris, Attorneys General, Robert R. Anderson and Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorneys General, Pamela C. Hamanaka and Lance E. Winters, Assistant Attorneys General, John R. Gorey, Jamie L. Fuster and Stephanie A. Miyoshi, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Daniel N. Abrahamson, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. S030553

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 4530THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,v. George Brett Williams, De