Filter This View

  • Sherod v. Hester

    Publication Date: 2011-02-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-21
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10-7575

    UNPUBLISHEDSubmitted: January 13, 2011Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

  • Pharia v. Doris J.

    Publication Date: 2011-02-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-23
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 4
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 04-10-00783-CV

    04_10_00783_CV-23709.htmMEMORANDUMOPINION No.Honorable H. Paul Canales, Judge PresidingSitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, JusticeDISMISSEDp

  • Eliso Xavier Nash, Appellant v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-26
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NOS. PD-1744-10,, PD-1745-10,, PD-1746-10 & PD-1747-10

    ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS COUNTYKeasler, and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of App

  • James E. v. Michelin North America, Incorporated

    Publication Date: 2011-02-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-25
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10-2025

    UNPUBLISHEDSubmitted: January 18, 2011Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this ci

  • In re Freier

    Publication Date: 2009-10-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-10-15
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 2
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2-09-342-CV

    ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGMEMORANDUM OPINION*fn1The court has considered Relator's petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that the petition should be dism

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Massachusetts Legal Ethics & Malpractice 2017

    Authors: James S. Bolan, Sara N. Holden

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Jason Mack v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-28
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 03-10-00452-CR, NO. 03-10-00453-CR

    ORDERAppellant's counsel has filed his third motion for extension of time to file appellant's brief. We grant the motion and ORDER counsel to file appellant's brief no later than February 14, 2011.

  • Charles Winton Land, Jr v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2010-12-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-08
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1560-10, PD-1561-10

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i), because the petition does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court

  • Ex Parte Bradley Dale Emerson,

    Publication Date: 2011-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-12
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. WR-74,914-01

    Womack, J., not participating.ORDERPursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application fo

  • TXU Electric Delivery Co. v. Wojewski

    Publication Date: 2011-01-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-05-10
    Court: Tx. App. Dist. 5
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05-09-01457-CV

    DISMISSMEMORANDUM OPINIONBefore Justices O'Neill, Francis, and Murphy.The Court has before it the parties' agreed motion to dismiss appeal. In the motion, the parties state they have reached

  • Alan Joel Geick, Appellant v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-26
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1734-10

    ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN COUNTYKeasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of