Chief Justice Roberts' Year-End Report: Judiciary 'Not Immune' from Sexual Harassment
“We have a new challenge in the coming year,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in his annual year-end report. “Events in recent months have illuminated the depth of the problem of sexual harassment in the workplace, and events in the past few weeks have made clear that the judicial branch is not immune.”
December 31, 2017 at 06:00 PM
5 minute read
Without mentioning Judge Alex Kozinski by name, Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. on Sunday decried recent reports about sexual harassment in the workplace and said the problem warrants “serious attention from all quarters of the judicial branch.”
Roberts discussed the issue in his annual year-end report, just weeks after Kozinski, former chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit abruptly retired amidst news reports quoting female law clerks and others who stated that he engaged them in unwelcomed and sexually charged conversations and physical interactions.
“We have a new challenge in the coming year,” Roberts wrote. “Events in recent months have illuminated the depth of the problem of sexual harassment in the workplace, and events in the past few weeks have made clear that the judicial branch is not immune.”
Roberts spelled out his previously announced plan to assemble a “working group” to examine whether changes are needed in the federal judiciary's codes of conduct and guidance to employees “on issues of confidentiality and reporting of instances of misconduct,” as well as “our rules for investigating and processing misconduct complaints.”
The widely used law clerk handbook has already been amended to make it clear that judicial employees can make complaints about sexual harassment without fear of violating the judiciary's code of confidentiality.
In an online essay one of Kozinski's victims, former law clerk Heidi Bond, pointed to the confidentiality rules imposed on clerks as a key factor that made it difficult for her to file a complaint against the judge.
Roberts referred to that concern even as he expressed “great confidence in the men and women who comprise our judiciary.” Roberts wrote, “I am sure that the overwhelming number have no tolerance for harassment and share the view that victims must have clear and immediate recourse to effective remedies.”
Improving and clarifying procedures for complaints was one focus of a December 20 letter to Roberts and other judiciary officials, signed by more than 700 former and current law clerks and law professors. Jaime Santos, one of the organizers of the letter campaign, said Sunday she was pleased that Roberts addressed the issue.
“A robust review and effective changes can have a huge impact on the lives and careers of future law clerks and other employees, and on the legal profession as a whole,” said Santos, an associate at Goodwin Procter. She urged Roberts and other leaders to “formally include past and current law clerks in that working group. If there is anything that the last six months of reporting on sexual harassment have taught us, it is that the individuals most affected by sexual harassment need to be part of the conversation about how to prevent and address it.”
The chief justice's comments about sexual harassment came on pages 11 and 12 of his 16-page report, suggesting that it may have been a late addition. The first 10 pages described and praised the response of judicial branch employees to hurricanes and wildfires that occurred in 2017.
“Judges and court employees responded to daunting challenges with extraordinary neighborliness, generosity, and dedication,” Roberts said. One example came before Hurricane Maria reached Puerto Rico in September. The Justice Department's Bureau of Prisons relocated 1,200 detailed individuals to mainland facilities in Mississippi, Florida, Alabama and Georgia, which also meant that judges, translators, federal defenders and other judicial personnel in those states would be needed to handle emergency proceedings and the like.
“I happened to be in Jackson meeting with Mississippi federal judges when word arrived that a large number of the detainees would be sent to that state,” Roberts wrote. “Many of the judges in the room raised their hands on the spot to volunteer to take on the extra work.” He also said court employees from around the country contributed funds and care packages to their colleagues in affected areas.
By federal law (28 U.S.C. 452), Roberts noted, U.S. courts are “deemed always open” for official business—an easy rule most of the time. “When disaster strikes,” he said, “it can be honored only through the tireless efforts of judges, court employees, Administrative Office staff, and the many friends of the judiciary.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Absurd Costs'?: Visa Faces Antitrust Class-Action Surge Following DOJ Complaint
3 minute read'Systemic and Pervasive'?: DiCello Levitt Alleges WWE Child Sexual Abuse Scandal
3 minute readThe 2024 NLJ Awards: Professional Excellence—Appellate Hot List
4th Circuit Revives Workplace Retaliation Lawsuit Against Biden's HHS Secretary
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250