Kozinski Harassment Inquiry Is Routed to the Second Circuit
Chief Justice John Roberts has called on Chief Judge Robert Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to head up an inquiry into sexual harassment complaints against Ninth Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski.
December 15, 2017 at 03:48 PM
5 minute read
U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. has routed a formal inquiry into allegations that former Chief Judge Alex Kozinski sexually harassed former clerks and externs to Chief Judge Robert Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Roberts' letter to Katzmann announcing the move was made public Friday afternoon.
Chief Judge Sidney Thomas of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an order Thursday initiating a complaint against Kozinski, a little less than a week after The Washington Post reported that six former clerks or externs at the court accused Kozinski of asking them to view pornography or subjected them to inappropriate comments. More women have come forward since with similar allegations.
Under rules adopted in 2008 by the Judicial Conference of the United States, the policymaking body of the federal courts, chief judges have discretion to seek an informal resolution if they have probable cause to believe misconduct has occurred. A special committee may be formed to investigate if that process fails or proves unfeasible.
According to the rules: “When a chief judge has information constituting reasonable grounds for inquiry into whether a covered judge has engaged in misconduct or has a disability, the chief judge may conduct an inquiry, as he or she deems appropriate, into the accuracy of the information even if no related complaint has been filed.”
The rules allow in “exceptional circumstances” for chief judges to ask the chief justice to transfer a proceeding and Thomas made that request when initiating the complaint.
In Friday's letter, Roberts wrote: “I have selected the Judicial Council of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to accept the transfer and to exercise the powers of a judicial council with respect to the identified complaint and any pending or new complaints relating to the same subject matter.”
These sexual misconduct allegations are not the first time that Kozinski has been at the center of controversy involving computers or pornography. In 2000, Kozinski, then the chief judge of the Ninth Circuit, and some colleagues protested after discovering that the Judicial Conference had installed software to monitor computers use by the then-30,000 federal court employees. The monitoring revealed some employees were using court computers to download pornography.
Kozinski and others wrote letters to the head of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts objecting. Kozinski also wrote a legal memorandum suggesting that the practice violated privacy laws and disabled the software. The head of the administrative office filed a complaint against Kozinski for disabling the system, but that complaint was dismissed.
In 2008, the Los Angeles Times reported that Kozinski maintained a publicly accessible website that contained sexually explicit photos and videos. The judge told the paper he did not realize the site was publicly available and he kept it as his private storage. While he said some of the material was inappropriate, he said some was “funny.”
At Kozinski's request, the Ninth Circuit initiated a misconduct inquiry related to the website. In that case, the formal investigation was referred to the Third Circuit's judicial council by the chief justice. The Third Circuit ultimately “admonished” Kozinski for “conduct exhibiting poor judgment with respect to this material created a public controversy that can reasonably be seen as having resulted in embarrassment to the institution of the federal judiciary.”
Kozinski, 67, has served on the Ninth Circuit since his appointment by President Ronald Reagan in 1985. He was chief judge from November 2007 to December 2014.
Read the letter from Chief Justice Roberts to Second Circuit Judge Robert Katzmann:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readOpenAI, NYTimes Counsel Quarrel Over Erased OpenAI Training Data
Meta Seeks Declaratory Judgment in VR Eyewear Tech Patent Infringement Case
Trending Stories
- 1AI: An Enhancement, Not a Replacement for Attorneys
- 2Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
- 3Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
- 4'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
- 5Call for Nominations: TLI's Pennsylvania Legal Awards 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250