How Non-California Law Schools Fared on the July 2017 Exam
Who says California's bar exam is too tough? Not graduates of University of Chicago Law School. All 28 Chicago alumni who took the bar exam for the first time in July 2017 passed.
January 23, 2018 at 05:12 PM
3 minute read
Who says California's bar exam is too tough? Not graduates of University of Chicago Law School.
All 28 Chicago alumni who took the bar exam for the first time in July 2017 passed, according to figures for non-California law schools released this week by the state bar. The pass rate was the only perfect one recorded among schools—in and outside California—with more than 10 graduates taking the exam. The state bar does not reveal scores for smaller cohorts because of privacy concerns.
First-time test-takers at other top-tier law schools fared nearly as well. Thirty-three out of 34 Yale Law School graduates passed. Ninety-four percent of Harvard Law School alumni passed as did 93 percent from Duke University School of Law.
Pass rates improved significantly, too, for other top-ranked schools. 75 percent of Boston University School of Law graduates passed the July 2017 sitting, compared with just 13 percent a year earlier. Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law saw its success rate jump from 58 percent to 83 percent.
The higher scores mirror an overall improvement among test-takers. The July 2017 pass rate of 49.6 percent ended a three-year slide in scores marked in 2016 by the lowest pass rate—43 percent—in three decades. The higher rate of success may be attributable to California moving from a three-day test to one held over two days.
California-based American Bar Association-accredited schools performed slightly better (with a 70 percent pass rate) than their out-of-state counterparts (67 percent).
California's bar requires the second highest passing score in the nation. Despite complaints from many law school deans, that will likely remain the case for some time as the state Supreme Court last year rejected calls to lower the passing, or cut, score of 145.
The new bar exam data is posted below:
Read more:
How California Law Schools Fared on July 2017 Bar Exam
Here's the July 2017 California Bar Exam Pass List
UC Hastings Law Dean Calls Bar Exam Failure for Top Schools 'Unconscionable'
California Bar Exam Ends 3-Year Slide, As Nearly Half Pass July Sitting
Read What California-Licensed Lawyers Said About Lowering the Exam Score
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCleary Nabs Public Company Advisory Practice Head From Orrick in San Francisco
Morgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
Trending Stories
- 1Supreme Court Considers Reviving Lawsuit Over Fatal Traffic Stop Shooting
- 2Long Hours and Lack Of Boundaries: Associates In India Are Leaving Their Firms
- 3Goodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
- 4'Didn't Notice Patient Wasn't Breathing': $13.7M Verdict Against Anesthesiologists
- 5'Astronomical' Interest Rates: $1B Settlement to Resolve Allegations of 'Predatory' Lending Cancels $534M in Small-Business Debts
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250