Former GEICO Lawyer Claims Racial Bias in New Lawsuit
Houston lawyer Carnegie Harvard Mims III says GEICO and its staff counsel in Houston harassed and discriminated against him.
April 30, 2018 at 05:22 PM
3 minute read
Houston lawyer Carnegie Harvard Mims III has sued GEICO and one of its in-house lawyers, claiming in an April 27 petition that he suffered racial discrimination, harassment and retaliation while working for seven years as a staff attorney for the car insurance giant.
Mims alleges defendants GEICO and Neil Levin, the managing attorney of the Houston staff counsel office, engaged in discriminatory actions against him in violation of the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
He seeks more than $1 million in damages from the defendants.
Among other allegations, Mims says the defendants failed to provide him with a personal secretary like other attorneys had, required him to clock in and out via email but did not require the same of other attorneys on staff, and also failed to give him merit increases, or even a merit review for four of the seven years he worked at the office.
Mims alleges he was fired in August 2016 in “retaliation for his opposition to discrimination in the workplace and his complaints to HR about the same.”
Levin did not return a telephone message left at Levin & Clinebell in Houston, where he practices as staff counsel for GEICO. The company also did not respond to messages seeking comment on the allegations.
In his petition, filed in state district court in Harris County, Mims claims he started working for Levin and GEICO in June 2009. During his tenure, Mims alleges, he handled more than 713 cases, including 50 jury trials—48 as first-chair—and most “yielded zero/take nothing verdicts” and the majority were favorable for GEICO. He alleges that he was the only African-American employee for the last five years he worked in the office.
Mims says he was not provided a personal secretary when he was hired, and despite a promise that the next secretary hired would work for him, Levin reneged on the promise and assigned the next secretary to an attorney hired two years after Mims.
Mims alleges that Levin required him in 2014 to start clocking in and out each day, and the practice did not stop until after Mims complained to the GEICO human resources department.
Mims also alleges that when the office moved to a new location in 2016, his office furniture was given to another attorney and he was assigned to a small temporary office, presumably while waiting for new furniture. “The furniture never arrived, and Mr. Mims was never moved from the temporary office,” the petition alleges.
“All of defendants' above actions created a hostile work environment and had a negative effect on the physical and psychological well-being of Mr. Mims and his productivity while he was employed by defendant GEICO,” Mims alleges.
Mims additionally alleges that after he accepted a job as an attorney at Hadi Law Firm in Houston, Levin and GEICO retaliated against him by filing motions to disqualify him from litigation his new firm was handling against GEICO or its policyholders. Mims alleges that was an attempt to get him fired from his current job.
Husein Hadi, founder of Hadi Law Firm who represents Mims in Mims v. Government Employees Insurance, did not immediately return a telephone message seeking a comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
Delaware Supreme Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of Case Law on Anticompetition Provisions
3 minute readThe Week in Data Dec. 19: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Davis Polk Moves to New, Expanded Redwood City Office
Trending Stories
- 1Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 2Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 3Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 4Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 5Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250