Higher Law: New Year, New Expectations | A RICO Suit Fizzles in California | Data Breach Concerns In Focus
Here's our quick roundup of things we're watching in the new year—happy New Year! Plus, we've got a new ruling from a California federal judge in a RICO case, and firms are ever more concerned about data privacy and cannabis. Thanks for reading Higher Law!
January 03, 2019 at 04:00 PM
7 minute read
Welcome back to Higher Law, our weekly briefing on all things cannabis. I'm Cheryl Miller, reporting for Law.com from Sacramento. Happy new year! I hope your holidays were festive.
To kick of 2019, we're looking at issues likely to shape the year ahead for the cannabis industry. Plus, another RICO claim targeting a marijuana grow bit the dust. And we've got a link to a new report on why cannabis practices are increasingly focusing on data privacy.
Thank you, Higher Lawyers, for ringing in the new year with us. As always, I appreciate your story tips, trend alerts and feedback. What would you like to see us cover in 2019? Drop me a line at [email protected] or you can call me at 916-448-2935. Follow me on Twitter at @capitalaccounts.
2019: What We're Watching
Almost one year ago to the day, then-U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions rescinded the Cole memo, casting a pall over the state-legal marijuana industry.
Welcome, 2019. How things have changed.
Sessions is out. A new, marijuana-friendlier, Democratic House of Representatives is in, and there seems to be a general mood of optimism among long-time regulated market advocates that an end to federal prohibition is coming sooner rather than later.
Here's a look at some of the issues that will shape legal marijuana's fortunes in the year ahead.
>>> Whither Washington. Michael Correia, director of governmental affairs for the National Cannabis Industry Association, said in a recent webcast that Democrats' control of the House “is really going to speed up the momentum that we've had.”
Among the bills high on the association's priority list is the STATES Act, bipartisan legislation in the U.S. Senate that would provide legalized states some protection from federal interference while encouraging more banking and tax equity for state-compliant marijuana businesses. The bill still faces tough odds in the Republican-controlled Senate, but any vote on the bill “is really an opportunity to see where senators stand” on the issues, Steve Fox, the association's strategic advisor, said during the webcast.
Another issue to watch, Correia said, is protections for banks that serve the marijuana industry, particularly medical marijuana operators. “If one bill were to shake loose and move through, I think banking would be a good one.”
>>> Start spreading the news. Recreational weed could come to New York state in 2019. Gov. Mario Cuomo once called marijuana a gateway drug. Now he's pushing for quick legalization, eyeing a potential $670 million in tax revenues—perhaps for subway upgrades.
>>> More M&A craziness. Harris Bricken attorney Tatiana Logan says in a Canna Law Blog post that 2019 will be “a banner year” for cannabis mergers and acquisitions.
“ The number of licensed cannabis entities existing today is very limited and will be slow to grow and expand in states with legalization,” Logan writes. “In turn, just by virtue of holding a license, your cannabis business holds inherent value to strategic and financial buyers.”
Canadian legalization and keen cannabis interest from the alcohol (more on that below) and tobacco industries are also contributing to all the transactional work.
>>> Hemp. Congress can't agree on marijuana, but members legalized industrial hemp in the farm bill signed into law last month. The federal blessing of the non-psychoactive plant will boost cultivation and markets, particularly for operations deriving CBD from hemp.
Colorado-based Dixie Brands Inc., which manufactures CBD-infused health supplements for humans and CBD food and snacks and food for pets, issued a post-bill-signing statement saying that the legislation means the U.S Drug Enforcement Agency can no longer block interstate sales of hemp products and that banks and credit card companies can do business with producers.
“Downstream benefits of the Farm Bill include expanding access into more mainstream retail by removing additional regulatory barriers for carrying hemp and CBD-rich products,” the company said.
California Judge Shuts Down a RICO Claim
Another attempt to use RICO to shutter a neighborhood pot grow has failed in court. U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar (above) of California's Northern District recently dismissed racketeering claims brought by neighbors of a reportedly stinky marijuana operation in Sonoma County, concluding that they had failed to “adequately allege” the property damages required by the federal RICO statute.
In a Dec. 27 ruling, Tigar noted that the marijuana grow's owner and cultivator, Carlos Zambrano and Green Earth Coffee LLC, reached a settlement with Sonoma County to stop all unpermitted operations at the site outside Petaluma by Nov. 15.
“While Plaintiffs have alleged a diminution in present market value of their homes, because the nuisance has been abated and the cause of the depreciation has been removed, Plaintiffs have not sufficiently pleaded an injury to property,” Tigar wrote. The Sonoma County agreement also requires the property owner, Flying Rooster LLC, to record a covenant “permanently prohibiting” commercial cannabis operations at the site.
A federal judge in Oregon this summer dismissed RICO claims brought by grow-site neighbors, saying the plaintiffs had failed to show they had suffered financial harm. A similar racketeering claim against a southern Colorado grow was tossed out by a federal judge in October.
Tigar did let stand the Sonoma County neighbors' claim for compensable injury under California's unfair competition law.
You Said It
“It's time the fed govt takes action by either removing cannabis from its official list of banned narcotics or approving safe harbor legislation that protects banks serving #cannabis biz from prosecution.”
—California Treasurer John Chiang tweeted that the federal government needs to take the lead on marijuana banking after his office released a report concluding that a state-run bank for cannabis businesses is not feasible.
In the Weeds…
>> As cannabis companies grew in size and reach in 2018, so did their legal staff. My colleague Caroline Spiezio took a look at some of the cannabis industry's in-house hires last year. [Corporate Counsel]
>> Data breaches are bad enough. Breaches that expose patients' medical marijuana information or data about consumers who live in states where cannabis is illegal are even bigger potential threats. Law firms' cannabis practices are increasingly focusing on data privacy as part of their compliance counsel. [Bloomberg Law]
>> Legal pot is getting easier to find in the U.S. So why is quality cannabis for clinical research so difficult to obtain? Blame anti-marijuana politics and, ironically, a focus on ending prohibition. Oh, and that sanctioned product from the University of Mississippi? “It's brown, muddy garbage,” says one researcher. [Politico]
>> Oregon lawmakers are looking at exporting pot to other marijuana-legal states. The proposal is being pushed by the Craft Cannabis Alliance, and it faces plenty of obstacles. What state, and maybe more importantly, what state's growers would be willing to accept imports? And would interstate sales, even between marijuana-legal states, be one step too far for federal authorities? [Salem Statesman Journal]
>> Ohio regulators have authorized a $2.1 million loan to state agencies facing medical marijuana lawsuits. The companies are being sued by companies that were denied medical marijuana growers' licenses. The initial $1 million budgeted by the state for legal costs wasn't enough. [AP]
The Calendar: What's Next
Jan. 11 - The Colorado Winter Hemp Summit will be held in Ft. Collins. Attorneys from the Hoban Law Group and Vicente Sederberg are scheduled to join other speakers to discuss the hemp industry and the impact of the new federal farm bill.
Jan. 17-18 - The National Business Institute hosts “Marijuana Business Law in California” in San Francisco. Scheduled speakers include 10 regional attorneys.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNY Cannabis Marketing Rulings / Rescheduling Effects / Honigman's Work on Trademark Suit / Goodbye
9 minute readWorkplace Weed and Labor Pacts / State AGs and Hemp / Maryland Licensing Suit / Vicente Sues Recruiter
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250