Breaking Down the Evolution of Legal Services Delivery: A Preview of the Business of Law Forum
The Business of Law Forum at Legalweek New York is focused on what is driving general counsel's decision making and how they approach selecting legal service providers.
January 15, 2019 at 03:21 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Law firms are operating in a unique environment in 2019. They are coming off of what, for many, was a record financial year, with promises of big gains in 2019 as well. Yet there is a recession looming and the growing threat of alternative law companies and the Big Four is ever present. Similarly, in-house legal departments are grappling with how to be responsive to their business units, which legal services providers are the right fit and how the legal department can drive revenue and minimize risk.
Helping you answer those questions and provide insight into what your peers and the larger market are doing, all while giving access to the client point of view, was exactly why we created the Business of Law Forum. I didn't just want to quote people on these subjects in the pages of The American Lawyer, Corporate Counsel and beyond. I wanted to foster real-life discussion and debate all in the hopes of helping the profession move forward in an exciting and sometimes challenging environment.
And moving forward can't be done in a vacuum. That is why the forum, taking place on January 29-30 at the New York Hilton Midtown as part of ALM's Legalweek, brings together high-level thought leaders from law departments, law firms, the Big Four, consultancies and more to hash out what success looks like in the legal profession these days and how to get there.
All this talk of change, however, is meaningless if it isn't done with the clients' needs in mind, which is why we have a particular focus this year on what is driving decision making in legal departments and the C-suite.
During the Business of Law Forum, you will hear from general counsel on topics ranging from the business pressures driving their decision making to what they think of law firm innovation, global law firm expansion, pricing and everything in between. You will hear from the Big Four about just what their plans are for the U.S. legal market and beyond. Hear our panel of analysts and data experts on what work is at risk of being handled by other providers and what law firm business models are succeeding. All this and much more is on tap for what will be an opportunity for law firm and law department leadership to work together on navigating and crafting the evolution of the legal industry.
The sessions were developed by The American Lawyer's editorial team in conjunction with an advisory board of law firm and law department leaders, legal educators and consultants. The sessions are equally applicable to heads of law firms, GCs, members of firm and corporate c-suites and anyone interested in the business of law.
And please reach out to me at [email protected] with story ideas, questions, or topics you think we should tackle. The best article ideas come from what our readers are experiencing on the ground. We hope to see you at Legalweek and continue these important conversations well into 2019 and beyond!
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
Big Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace for Changes Under Trump
4 minute readPolsinelli's Revenue and Profits Surge Amid Partner De-Equitizations, Retirements
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 2GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 3Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
- 4Warner Bros. Accused of Misleading Investors on NBA Talks
- 5FTC Settles With Security Firm Over AI Claims Under Agency's Compliance Program
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250