Silicon Valley's In-House Hiring Takes Hit From High Cost of Living
Candidates for in-house legal jobs in Silicon Valley are turning down offers, citing the region's high cost of living as the reason for their decision.
June 24, 2019 at 05:19 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
The rent is too damn high in Silicon Valley—and it's driving off in-house candidates.
Bay Area legal recruiters said it has become increasingly common for in-house candidates at all levels to turn down offers in Silicon Valley, explicitly citing “cost of living” as the reason for their decision. The shrinking pool of available candidates coupled with growing demand for in-house counsel is keeping positions open in the region for longer than usual.
“I've had candidates not be able to accept assignments because of the cost of living here. And that's what they say, 'cost of living.' I think it's a very common term now that I'm hearing more regularly,” said Elisabetta Fabiani, a legal recruiter and Silicon Valley branch director of staffing firm Robert Half International.
She's seen the biggest impact on legal department support staff hiring in towns such as Facebook's home base Menlo Park and neighboring Palo Alto, where Tesla Inc. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are located. The average home price in either town is more than $2 million, according to Zillow.
The average pay for in-house support employee—administrators, file clerks and secretaries—is under $60,000, according to Robert Half's 2019 salary guide.
That's left support staff candidates, many of whom Fabiani said live further south in San Jose, with a tough choice: take the job and a possible two-hour round-trip commute, or waive the offer for a position closer to affordable housing.
“We have candidates simply turning down jobs based on location,” Fabiani said. “They don't even wait to hear the pay, to hear about the job. The minute I tell them the job's in Menlo Park or the job's in Palo Alto, they politely decline. Which is very different from seven years ago.”
Lawyers in-house are left to pick up the administrative work that needs to be done as job openings linger unfilled for weeks, sometimes months, longer than usual, she said. Legal departments have begun introducing hybrid roles, merging paralegal positions with support responsibilities to offset the lack of administrative staff.
Carol Warren Simon, a managing director at legal recruiting firm Major, Lindsey & Africa's San Francisco in-house practice group, said she's seen legal departments struggle to attract nonlocal candidates for “mid- and lower-level attorney roles” with five to 10 years of experience.
Candidates have explicitly told her, too, that “cost of living” is their reason for turning jobs down. That's a shift from when she started in legal recruiting around five years ago.
“Candidates from other parts of the country were more often than not very eager to come to the Bay Area. Yes, it's expensive, but it's where it's happening, it's exciting, it's beautiful. Everybody seemed to want to come here,” Simon said. “But in the last year or so I'm hearing much more hesitancy about it.”
The “veneer has gotten a little thin as far as the Bay Area goes,” she said, speculating it's in part due to increased media coverage of rising costs and wealth inequality in the region.
General counsel hiring hasn't been unaffected. While GCs and chief legal officers are the top paid earners in their department, that's true in any city. Fabiani said she's seen GC roles stay open longer than usual, sometimes more than six months, with candidates concerned over the high cost of living.
Legal execs might be offered a high compensation to lead a legal team in Silicon Valley, but, Simon noted, “that package doesn't go as far in the Bay Area as it might in other parts of the country.” She's seen increased competition from states such as Texas, where taxes, commute times and home prices are often lower.
Bay Area companies are changing the way they hire legal talent in response. Simon said she's seen a slight shift in focus on hiring local attorneys who don't have to move for the position.
There is also an increased emphasis on noncompensation perks: mentorship, career development and a powerful company mission. While Silicon Valley is expensive, it's also still a hotbed of tech startups and talent, Simon and Fabiani said. That's a big plus for some lawyers.
“The Bay Area has remained a leader in innovative companies, innovative technologies of all kinds. That continues to be a huge draw that employers will certainly emphasize,” Simon said. “Even if they can't pay the same compensation … they are inventing tomorrow's technology.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigation Involving Failed Banks: What Litigators and In-House Counsel Should Be Thinking About
5 minute readCoinbase CLO Paul Grewal Blasts SEC for 'Enforcement-First' Crypto Crackdown
Los Angeles Lakers Ex-General Counsel Jim Perzik Dies From COVID Complications
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250