Judge Rebukes Unicorn Artist's Motion as 'Insensitive to Others in the Current Environment'
A plaintiffs lawyer bringing an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order to halt sales of knockoff unicorn and dragon art got a sharp rebuke from U.S. District Judge Steven Seeger, in light of the COVID-19 outbreak. "If there's ever a time when emergency motions should be limited to genuine emergencies, now's the time," he wrote.
March 23, 2020 at 02:49 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge gave a harsh rebuke to a plaintiffs lawyer bringing a motion to halt sales of knockoff unicorn and dragon art, calling it "insensitive to others in the current environment."
"The world is facing a real emergency," wrote U.S. District Judge Steven Seeger, in rejecting Art Ask Agency's motion for an emergency temporary restraining order. "Plaintiff is not."
In a related minute order, Seeger said the plaintiff sought a "bloated order that imposes extraordinary demands on third parties."
"To put it bluntly, plaintiff's proposed order seems insensitive to others in the current environment," he wrote in the minute order. "Simply put, trademark infringement is an important consideration, but so is the strain that the rest of the country is facing, too. It is important to keep in perspective the costs and benefits of forcing everyone to drop what they're doing to stop the sale of knock-off unicorn product, in the midst of a pandemic."
Plaintiffs attorney Michael Hierl did not respond to a request for comment. His firm, Chicago-based Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, had this statement on its website: "As the world deals with the COVID-19 pandemic, we want you to know that HSPRD stands ready to continue providing our clients with the highest level of legal services, just as we always have for the past thirty-five years. At the same time, we plan to service our clients in a manner that recognizes the importance of social distancing to protect the health of our employees and the greater public."
The March 18 order comes as lawyers grapple to handle existing cases in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic, which has prompted about a dozen states, including California, New York and Illinois, to order residents to stay home. As of Monday, there were 33,404 cases of COVID-19 in the United States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Art Ask Agency filed its copyright infringement case in federal court in the Northern District of Illinois on March 9, alleging multiple internet sites out of China sold knockoff mugs, T-shirts, puzzles, handbags and other items depicting fantasy subjects such as unicorns, dragons and elves, designed by British artist Anne Stokes. The plaintiff, based in Spain, filed a motion for temporary restraining order on March 10.
On March 16, Northern District of Illinois Chief Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer issued an order putting civil litigation on hold in light of the COVID-19 outbreak.
Seeger rescheduled the temporary restraining motion for April 13 ("This court thought it was a bad time to hold a hearing on the motion," Seeger wrote in last week's order), prompting Art Ask Agency to file an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order on March 18.
In his order rejecting that motion, Seeger noted that the plaintiff made no showing of anticipated losses due to copyright infringement of its products. "One wonders if the fake fantasy products are experiencing brisk sales at the moment," he wrote. The plaintiff's demand to force information from third parties such as Amazon, Facebook and Google would "distract people who may have bigger problems on their hands right now."
In addition, the plaintiff had sought a hearing on March 19, and Seeger has banned motion notices for dates between March 19 and March 27. He also ordered a six-week extension on fact discovery and told lawyers not to schedule in-person depositions before April 17.
"The court can still hear emergency motions, but resources are stretched and time is at a premium," Seeger wrote. "If there's ever a time when emergency motions should be limited to genuine emergencies, now's the time."
He also quoted lawyer Elihu Root, who was Secretary of War under President Theodore Roosevelt: "About half of the practice of a decent lawyer is telling would-be clients that they are damned fools and should stop."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
Who Got the Work: 16 Lawyers Appointed to BioLab Class Action Litigation
4 minute readAttorneys Go to DC Federal Court Seeking Damages for Plaintiffs in Oct. 7, 2023, Attack on Israel
3 minute readUber Not Responsible for Turning Over Information on 'Dangerous Riders' to Competitor, Judge Finds
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1From ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Julie Cantor, Associate General Counsel at Studs, Inc.
- 3Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Chris Correnti, President & CEO & General Counsel AGC America, Inc.
- 4‘What’s Up With Morgan & Morgan?’ Law, Advertising and a Calculated Rise
- 5Cravath Matches 'Special' and Year-End Bonuses
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250