Bicoastal Network of Lawyers Sue Southwest Airlines Over Refunds for Flights Canceled Due to Coronavirus
The suit argues that the company's policy of offering credits for canceled flights violates its contract with customers and federal law.
April 14, 2020 at 04:32 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
Attorneys from Philadelphia to Sherman Oaks, California, have filed a class action lawsuit against Southwest Airlines for allegedly failing to provide reimbursements for flights canceled as a result of the coronavirus.
Four firms filed the lawsuit, captioned Bombin v. Southwest Airlines, Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The suit argues that the company's policy of offering credits for canceled flights violates its contract with customers and federal law.
Philadelphia attorney James Shah of Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah filed the suit, along with attorneys Jeff Ostrow of Kopelowitz Ostrow Ferguson Weiselberg Gilbert in Fort Lauderdale, Florida; Hassan Zavareei of Tycko & Zavareei in Washington, D.C.; and Pearson, Simon & Warshaw lawyers Melissa Weiner in Minneapolis and Daniel Warshaw in Sherman Oaks.
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of a Pennsylvania man whose flight was canceled last month due to the ongoing outbreak of the coronavirus.
"Despite the fact that plaintiff could not take the flight he booked, and defendant could not offer any comparable accommodations on another flight, plaintiff was not given a refund, but was only offered a credit for use on a future flight," the plaintiff said in his 14-page complaint.
The lawsuit is similar to a pair of class action suits that were filed against United Airlines earlier this month. Both of those suits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Daniel Herrera of Cafferty Clobes Meriwether & Sprengel and Joseph Sauder of Sauder Schelkopf filed one of those suits, and Hagens Berman Sobol & Shapiro lawyer Steve Berman filed the other.
Like the suits filed in Illinois, the class action in Pennsylvania federal court also focuses in part on the U.S. Department of Transportation's mandate that airlines fully refund passengers whose flights were canceled in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to the complaint, in late February plaintiff Adrian Bombin bought a ticket to fly from BWI Airport to Havana, Cuba. A few days later, however, Southwest canceled flights to Havana as a result of the coronavirus pandemic. The complaint said that by late March, the company announced it was canceling about 1,500 flights each day, or about 40%, of its normal daily service.
On April 3, the DOT issued an enforcement notice saying airlines are obligated to refund passengers for flights that were canceled or significantly changed in ways that were not acceptable for the customer.
According to the complaint, after the cancellations, Dallas-based Southwest offered passengers to either rebook their flights to a different route that had not been canceled, or to obtain a travel credit. However, Bombin alleged that Southwest's Contract of Carriage mandates that when the carrier cancels flights, the company must provide for refunds, rather than credits.
Given the contract's provisions, and the DOT's mandate, Bombin alleged the carrier needs to provide refunds for all customers whose flights were canceled beginning in early March.
"Here, plaintiff was not given the choice of being transported on the next available flight at no additional charge. His flight was canceled and there were no alternative Southwest flights to accommodate him from the trip's origin (BWI) to his destination," Bombin said in the complaint. "He had not used any portion of the ticket for his trip. Thus, pursuant to the terms of the Contract of Carriage, plaintiff is entitled to a refund of the fare for the entire trip in U.S. dollars to his original form of payment."
The suit raises a single breach of contract claim.
In an emailed statement, a spokesman for Southwest said the company has some of the most "customer-friendly policies in the industry."
"If a flight is cancelled by Southwest, customers may select a new flight between the same origin and destination on any date (currently extended until 60 days from the original date of travel) without paying any difference in fare, may receive travel funds for future use (currently extended to June 30, 2021), or may request a refund to the original form of payment," spokesman Brian Parrish said. "Southwest will review this complaint and will defend our policies accordingly as our focus is always on taking care of our customers, especially during these unprecedented times."
According to the docket, the suit has been assigned to Judge John Gallagher.
Shah did not return a message seeking comment.
READ THE COMPLAINT:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readAm Law 200 Firm to Defend PUMA in Latest Quarrel Over Patented Shoe Technology
Apple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
Who Got the Work: 16 Lawyers Appointed to BioLab Class Action Litigation
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250