Why Silicon Valley, Not Wall Street, Is the Future of the Legal Industry: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
March 18, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
THERE WILL BE LAWSUITS - If your first thought when someone brings up the metaverse is "I liked it better when it was called 'The Sims,'" this week's Law.com Litigation Trendspotter column is for you. You may not quite understand the metaverse (or NFTs or blockchain), but don't be too hard on yourself—no one really knows where all this is going. But given the staggering monetary investment that has already been poured into the metaverse, it's definitely not going away. Litigators would be wise to employ a similar strategy as the companies and law firms that have already entered virtual reality—get in on the ground floor and help shape the architecture. And really, the metaverse is the perfect blank canvas for creative litigators: a land of endless business opportunities, social possibilities—and risks. It's a parallel dimension that is likely to give rise to many of the same disputes that we regularly encounter in the real world (or "meatspace," if you insist—but please don't.) It also, however, promises plenty of brand new, utterly unique causes of action.
WRITING'S ON THE WALL - At a time when businesspeople are giddy at the possibility of avatars being able to buy digital shoes in a virtual reality Foot Locker, it goes without saying that tech rules everything around us. For evidence of this, look no further than Big Law. As Law.com's Ben Seal writes in this week's Law.com Barometer newsletter, firms of all kinds flourished in 2021, but the outstanding success of the Silicon Valley elites stands out as an important indicator of where the industry is headed. For decades, close relationships with banks and financial institutions were a sure sign that a law firm had a bright present and a brighter future. In recent years, private equity bona fides became the defining trait of many firms that outperformed the competition. Those well-heeled client bases are still the center of gravity for plenty of the top firms in the country, but the seemingly boundless growth available to tech companies in an increasingly digital world means the law firms who serve them now represent the future of the legal industry. "A shift from Wall Street to the West will allow a new group of firms to serve as a model for the rest of Big Law," Seal writes. "And given their close connections to so many of the tech companies that have disrupted the economy over the past two decades, that's sure to bring significant change to law firms." To receive the Law.com Barometer directly to your inbox each week, click here.
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis partner Barry S. Alexander has entered an appearance for Southwest Airlines in a pending lawsuit involving COVID-19 mask requirements. The case, over alleged disability-based discrimination, was filed Jan. 18 in New York Eastern District Court by attorney Kristina S. Heuser on behalf of Medora Clai Reading. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Lashann Dearcy Hall, is 1:22-cv-00265, Reading v. Southwest Airlines Co. et. al. >>Read the complaint on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
DISPIRITED - Spirit Airlines and its board of directors were slapped with a securities lawsuit Thursday in New York Eastern District Court. The lawsuit, brought by Rigrodsky Law on behalf of James Hiebert, arises from the proposed merger between Spirit Airlines and Frontier for $6.6 billion. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 1:22-cv-01494, Hiebert v. Spirit Airlines, Inc. et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Federal Appeals Judge Suggests Yale Law Protesters 'Should Be Disqualified for Potential Clerkships' By Christine Charnosky Ex-Judiciary Employees Tell Congress Harassment, Discrimination Policies Are 'Severely Flawed' By Avalon Zoppo Husch Blackwell Becomes First Am Law 100 Firm to Launch Psychedelics Practice By Dan Packel The 2022 Go-To Law Schools Report By Christine CharnoskyBy Law.com International and Law.com Staffs
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
THE REPLACEMENTS - Independent Russian law firms are experiencing a surge of work as corporations seek to limit their exposure to Russia at the same time as international law firms are closing down their Moscow operations, Law.com International's Hannah Walker reports. Several local firms say they are picking up mandates dropped by international firms that have hurriedly exited Russia leaving some clients without legal counsel. "We do see an increase of work as many western clients are seeking advice on their Russian operations and several Russian clients are assessing the risks of sanctions regime," said Suren Gortsunyan, managing partner at Rybalkin, Gortsunyan, Dyakin & Partners. Another managing partner at a Russian firm said he has seen a significant increase in clients approaching him for help in the last fortnight. The number of mandates his firm has been contacted on stands at "likely dozens" with a percentage increase in "multiple digits." Despite firms making public statements to wind down existing work in accordance with "legal and professional obligations," the managing partner said some corporations have been suddenly dropped and deals ditched midway.
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"Take ownership of your career, deliver great quality legal work, and think creatively about ways to bring value to your clients, including ways to contribute to their success."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDemocratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
7 minute readBig Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace for Changes Under Trump
4 minute readWill Trump Be a Boost to Quinn Emanuel's Fortunes in China?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250