Why Silicon Valley, Not Wall Street, Is the Future of the Legal Industry: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
March 18, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
THERE WILL BE LAWSUITS - If your first thought when someone brings up the metaverse is "I liked it better when it was called 'The Sims,'" this week's Law.com Litigation Trendspotter column is for you. You may not quite understand the metaverse (or NFTs or blockchain), but don't be too hard on yourself—no one really knows where all this is going. But given the staggering monetary investment that has already been poured into the metaverse, it's definitely not going away. Litigators would be wise to employ a similar strategy as the companies and law firms that have already entered virtual reality—get in on the ground floor and help shape the architecture. And really, the metaverse is the perfect blank canvas for creative litigators: a land of endless business opportunities, social possibilities—and risks. It's a parallel dimension that is likely to give rise to many of the same disputes that we regularly encounter in the real world (or "meatspace," if you insist—but please don't.) It also, however, promises plenty of brand new, utterly unique causes of action.
WRITING'S ON THE WALL - At a time when businesspeople are giddy at the possibility of avatars being able to buy digital shoes in a virtual reality Foot Locker, it goes without saying that tech rules everything around us. For evidence of this, look no further than Big Law. As Law.com's Ben Seal writes in this week's Law.com Barometer newsletter, firms of all kinds flourished in 2021, but the outstanding success of the Silicon Valley elites stands out as an important indicator of where the industry is headed. For decades, close relationships with banks and financial institutions were a sure sign that a law firm had a bright present and a brighter future. In recent years, private equity bona fides became the defining trait of many firms that outperformed the competition. Those well-heeled client bases are still the center of gravity for plenty of the top firms in the country, but the seemingly boundless growth available to tech companies in an increasingly digital world means the law firms who serve them now represent the future of the legal industry. "A shift from Wall Street to the West will allow a new group of firms to serve as a model for the rest of Big Law," Seal writes. "And given their close connections to so many of the tech companies that have disrupted the economy over the past two decades, that's sure to bring significant change to law firms." To receive the Law.com Barometer directly to your inbox each week, click here.
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis partner Barry S. Alexander has entered an appearance for Southwest Airlines in a pending lawsuit involving COVID-19 mask requirements. The case, over alleged disability-based discrimination, was filed Jan. 18 in New York Eastern District Court by attorney Kristina S. Heuser on behalf of Medora Clai Reading. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Lashann Dearcy Hall, is 1:22-cv-00265, Reading v. Southwest Airlines Co. et. al. >>Read the complaint on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
DISPIRITED - Spirit Airlines and its board of directors were slapped with a securities lawsuit Thursday in New York Eastern District Court. The lawsuit, brought by Rigrodsky Law on behalf of James Hiebert, arises from the proposed merger between Spirit Airlines and Frontier for $6.6 billion. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 1:22-cv-01494, Hiebert v. Spirit Airlines, Inc. et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
By Law.com International and Law.com Staffs
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
THE REPLACEMENTS - Independent Russian law firms are experiencing a surge of work as corporations seek to limit their exposure to Russia at the same time as international law firms are closing down their Moscow operations, Law.com International's Hannah Walker reports. Several local firms say they are picking up mandates dropped by international firms that have hurriedly exited Russia leaving some clients without legal counsel. "We do see an increase of work as many western clients are seeking advice on their Russian operations and several Russian clients are assessing the risks of sanctions regime," said Suren Gortsunyan, managing partner at Rybalkin, Gortsunyan, Dyakin & Partners. Another managing partner at a Russian firm said he has seen a significant increase in clients approaching him for help in the last fortnight. The number of mandates his firm has been contacted on stands at "likely dozens" with a percentage increase in "multiple digits." Despite firms making public statements to wind down existing work in accordance with "legal and professional obligations," the managing partner said some corporations have been suddenly dropped and deals ditched midway.
WHAT YOU SAID
"Take ownership of your career, deliver great quality legal work, and think creatively about ways to bring value to your clients, including ways to contribute to their success."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250