Silicon Valley's Slowdown Could Hurt Legal Tech's Hiring Prospects: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
October 05, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
HARDER TO HIRE - While the prospects of a recession have been a matter for debate, the uncertainty of the economic climate is certainly already having rippling effects across several industries, Law.com's Cassandre Coyle reports. Take, for example, Silicon Valley. After years of unthreatened growth, Big Tech is now dialing back amid the volatile economy. Many of the Big Tech giants are slowing down, if not freezing, hires, with some rescinding job offers and others announcing layoffs. This might be welcome news to the legal tech industry, which has struggled to compete with other industries for talent in the past. But whether Big Tech's recent slump could give legal tech a hiring edge is hard to tell. Instead, Silicon Valley's slowdown could bring its own set of challenges to the legal tech market. Jared Coseglia, founder and CEO of TRU Staffing Partners, said he doesn't expect a wave of talent from Big Tech to make its way to the legal tech industry, whether it be data scientists, engineers or other IT professionals. "We do not expect to see the kind of turnover that we saw during the pandemic with legal technology professionals as we head into this recession or whatever it's going to be," Coseglia said. He added, "what we expect to see is a diminishing amount of net new open job requisitions that are either put on hold or staffed conversely by contract hires to buffer against perpetual expectations of utilization." If anything, Big Tech's temporary slump could have the opposite effect on legal's hiring field, he said. "The real impact for legal tech on Big Tech's disposition of talent has more to do with people in legal tech taking contract jobs at those Big Tech companies in somewhat reinvented positions," Coseglia said.
WINTER WEATHER - The fall of cryptocurrency prices over the course of 2022 has already pushed major industry players to bankruptcy. Late last month, crypto-mining data center operator Compute North filed for bankruptcy, following the July bankruptcies of crypto lender Celsius, crypto brokerage Voyager Digital, and crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital. As the prolonged "crypto winter" approaches $1 trillion in losses this year, restructuring lawyers and their colleagues at financial and blockchain analytics firms predicted a rise in fraud and insolvency at a recent virtual roundtable hosted by litigation funder Burford Capital. As Law.com's Dan Roe reports, litigation finance will step up to meet the demand for counsel among insolvent companies and victims of digital assets fraud, some participants said. Meanwhile, the other parties involved in global crypto investigations and bankruptcies—courts, exchanges, and blockchain analysts—are finding innovative ways to help clients track and reclaim assets known for anonymity.
ON THE RADAR - Unitrin Safeguard Insurance, a subsidiary of Kemper Corp., filed a breach-of-contract lawsuit against real estate reporter and risk assessor Mueller Services and other defendants on Tuesday in New York Western District Court. The suit, brought by Zelle LLP, accuses Mueller of failing to identify property defects before Unitrin insured the property, which was subsequently damaged in a fire. Unitrin further alleges that it would not have insured the property had it known about the defects. Lawyers have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 1:22-cv-00752, Unitrin Safeguard Insurance Co. v. Barrow et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Yale Law Teams With Latham & Watkins to Help Diverse Students Apply to Law School By Christine Charnosky |
Elon Musk Renews Original Twitter Merger Offer in Bid That May Signal Truce By Ellen Bardash |
Kagan, Jackson Put Down Markers in Major Voting Rights Challenge By Marcia Coyle |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
As Global Law Firm Mergers Keep Coming, Will There Ever Be a New Swiss Verein?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Mental Health Issues Don’t Get a Holiday
- 2'It's Got to Be a Wake-Up Call:' Atlanta Attorney Hopes $16M Verdict Spurs Training Changes at Hotels
- 3FTC Bans 'Junk Fees' in Live-Event Tickets and Short-Term Lodging
- 4California Legal Awards Moving to Mid-Summer Date in 2025, Adds New Categories
- 5Law Student Sues NY Attorney Grievance Officials, Seeking Materials Over Sexual Assault Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250